Guided Bone Regeneration using a Combination of Novel Biomaterial and Type I Collagen for Isolated Ridge Defect to facilitate Delayed Implant Therapy: A Solitary Case Report
Rashmi Paramashivaiah, Pabbati K Vardhan, Munivenkatappa L Venkatesh
Citation Information :
Paramashivaiah R, Vardhan PK, Venkatesh ML. Guided Bone Regeneration using a Combination of Novel Biomaterial and Type I Collagen for Isolated Ridge Defect to facilitate Delayed Implant Therapy: A Solitary Case Report. Int J Oral Implantol Clin Res 2017; 8 (2-3):45-49.
Introduction: Ridge augmentation has attained a key role in implant placement to recreate the natural contour of the hard and soft tissues that may have been lost as a consequence of extraction. Ridge augmentation procedures require bone to be regenerated outside the existing bony walls or housing and are therefore often considered to be one of the most challenging surgical procedures.
Materials and methods: In the current case, a Seibert's class III defect was treated, followed by implant placement after 6 months. The bony deficit was managed with guided bone regeneration (GBR) techniques utilizing bone grafting material and membrane. Second surgery and the subsequent morbidity involved in the removal of nonresorbable membranes were tackled with the use of resorbable collagen membranes. Different bone graft materials are used routinely in combination with these membranes to facilitate space maintenance and to prevent membrane collapse. Particulate xenograft was used, as it restores the natural tissue architecture for placement of implant at a later stage. At the time of implant placement, the ridge was found to have the required dimensions.
Conclusion: Ridge augmentation using a combination of membrane and xenograft for Seibert's class III ridge defect is a predictable treatment option. It improves the restorative aspect of implant placement in compromised areas.
Cardaropoli G, Araujo M, Lindhe J. Dynamics of bone tissue formation in tooth extraction sites: an experimental study in dogs. J Clin Periodontol 2003 Sep;30(9):809-818.
Schropp L, Wenzel A, Kostopoulos L, Karring T. Bone healing and soft tissue contour changes following single-tooth extraction: a clinical and radiographic 12-month prospective study. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 2003 Aug;23(4):313-323.
Lekovic V, Kenney EB, Weinlaender M, Han T, Klokkevold P, Nedic M, Orsini M. A bone regenerative approach to alveolar ridge maintenance following tooth extraction. Report of 10 cases. J Periodontol 1997 Jun;68(6):563-570.
Lekovic V, Klokkevold PR, Kenney EB, Dimitrijelic B, Nedic M, Weinlaender M. Histologic evaluation of guided tissue regeneration using 4 barrier membranes: a comparative furcation study in dogs. J Periodontol 1998 Jan;69(1):54-61.
Lekovic V, Camargo PM, Klokkevold PR, Weinlaender M, Kenney EB, Dimitrijevic B, Nedic M. Preservation of alveolar bone in extraction sockets using bioabsorbable membranes. J Periodontol 1998 Sep;69(9):1044-1049.
Nemcovsky CE, Serfaty V. Alveolar ridge preservation following extraction of maxillary anterior teeth. Report on 23 consecutive cases. J Periodontol 1996 Apr;67(4):390-395.
Artzi Z, Nemcovsky CE. The application of deproteinized bovine bone mineral for ridge preservation prior to implantation. Clinical and histological observations in a case report. J Periodontol 1998 Sep;69(9):1062-1067.
Ashman A. Ridge preservation: important buzzwords in dentistry. Gen Dent 2000 May-Jun;48(3):304-312.
Seibert JS. Reconstruction of deformed partially edentulous ridges, using full thickness onlay grafts. Part I. Technique and wound healing. Compend Contin Educ Dent 1983 Sep- Oct;4(5):437-453.
BDIZ EDI. Cologne's classification of alveolar ridge defects. Germany: BDIZ EDI; 2013. [cited 2013 Feb]. Available from: https://www.bdizedi.org/bdiz/web.nsf/gfx/guidelines_ Konsensus-Leitfaden-2013_engl.pdf/$file/guidelines_Konsensus- Leitfaden-2013_engl.pdf.
McAllister BS, Haghighat K. Bone augmentation techniques. J Periodontol 2007 Mar;78(3):377-396.
Dahlin C, Linde A, Gottlow J, Nyman S. Healing of bone defects by guided tissue regeneration. Plastic Reconstr Surg 1988 May;81(5):672-676.
Dahlin C, Sennerby L, Lekholm U, Linde A, Nyman S. Generation of new bone around titanium implants using a membrane technique: an experimental study in rabbits. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1989 Spring;4(1):19-25.
Becker W, Becker BE. Guided tissue regeneration for implants placed into extraction sockets and for implant dehiscences: surgical techniques and case report. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 1990;10(5):376-391.
Becker W, Becker BE, Handlesman M, Celletti R, Ochsenbein C, Hardwick R, Langer B. Bone formation at dehisced dental implant sites treated with implant augmentation material: a pilot study in dogs. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 1990;10(2):92-101.
Gher ME, Quintero G, Assad D, Monaco E, Richardson AC. Bone grafting and guided bone regeneration for immediate dental implants in humans. J Periodontol 1994 Sep;65(9): 881-891.
Wang HL, Boyapati L. “PASS” principles for predictable bone regeneration. Implant Dent 2006 Mar;15(1):8-17.
von Arx T, Buser D. Horizontal ridge augmentation using autogenous block grafts and the guided bone regeneration technique with collagen membranes: a clinical study with 42 patients. Clin Oral Implants Res 2006 Aug;17(4):359-366.
Buser D, Bornstein MM, Weber HP, Grutter L, Schmid B, Belser UC. Early implant placement with simultaneous guided bone regeneration following single-tooth extraction in the esthetic zone: a cross-sectional, retrospective study in 45 subjects with a 2- to 4-year follow-up. J Periodontol 2008 Sep;79(9):1773-1781.
Twardowski T, Fertala A, Orgel JP, San Antonio JD. Type I collagen and collagen mimetics as angiogenesis promoting superpolymers. Curr Pharm Des 2007 Dec;13(35):3608-3621.
