The oral rehabilitation for a patient with severe loss of alveolar bone presents a challenge to clinicians. Replacing missing teeth in such a situation with fixed prostheses supported by dental implants often requires either bone grafting or basal implants. Sometimes, multiple surgeries and a longer healing time are required to overcome the unpredictable outcome of bone grafting. In a biomechanically compromised environment, strain to the crestal bone can be reduced by increasing the anteroposterior spread of implants, placement of longer implants, and maximizing the number of implants. Here, we present a clinical case of a patient who had undergone full mouth reconstruction with mandibular implant-supported fixed prostheses and maxillary metalfree crowns for discoloration. This case report demonstrates an immediate implant placement with All-on-4® concept, which may be an alternative to conventional bone grafting followed by implant placement. Also, principles of splinting and load sharing were followed by performing intraoral welding using titanium wires. We hypothesize that primary stability during implant placement is a prime factor contributing to our success.
Adell R, Lekholm U, Rockler B, Brånemark PI. A 15-year study of osseointegrated implants in the treatment of the edentulous jaw. Int J Oral Surg 1981 Dec;10(6):387-416.
Chiapasco M, Zaniboni M, Boisco M. Augmentation procedures for the rehabilitation of deficient edentulous ridges with oral implants. Clin Oral Implants Res 2006 Oct;17(Suppl 2):136-159.
Aghaloo TL, Moy PK. Which hard tissue augmentation techniques are the most successful in furnishing bony support for implant placement? Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2007 Jan;22 (Suppl):49-70.
Hears PE, Sailer HF. Neurosensory function after nerve lateralization of the inferior alveolar nerve and simultaneous insertion of implants. Oral Maxillofac Surg North Am 1994;7:707
Malo P, Rangert B, Nobre M. “All on Four” immediate function concept with Branemark System implants for completely edentulous mandibles; a retrospective clinical study. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2003;5(Suppl 1):S2-S9.
Taruna M, Chittaranjan B, Sudheer N, Tella S, Abusaad M. Prosthodontic perspective to all-on-4® concept for dental implants. J Clin Diagn Res 2014 Oct;8(10):ZE16-ZE19.
Galindo DF, Butura CC. Immediately loaded mandibular fixed implant prosthesis using the All-on-4® protocol: a report of 183 consecutively treated patients with 1 year of function in definitive prosthesis. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2012 May- Jun;27(3):628-633.
Isidor F. Influence of forces on peri-implant bone. Clin Oral Implants Res 2006 Oct;17(Suppl 2):8-18.
Khatami AH, Smith CR. “All-on-4®” immediate function concept and clinical report of treatment of an edentulous mandible with a fixed complete denture and milled titanium framework. J Prosthodont 2008 Jan;17(1):47-51.
Bellini CM, Romeo D, Galbusera F, Taschieri S, Raimondi MT, Zampelis A, et al. Comparison of tilted versus non-tilted implant-supported prosthetic designs for the restoration of the edentulous mandible: a biomechanical study. Int J Oral Maxillofacial Implants 2009 May-Jun;24(3):511-512.
Bevilacqua H, Tealdo T, Pera F, Menini M, Mossolov A, Drago C, et al. Three dimensional finite element analysis of load transmission using different implant inclinations and cantilever lengths. Int J Prosthodont 2008 Nov-Dec;21(6): 539-542.