International Journal of Oral Implantology & Clinical Research

Register      Login

VOLUME 8 , ISSUE 2-3 ( December, 2017 ) > List of Articles

REVIEW ARTICLE

Deciphering All-on-4® and Its Perspectives

Ashi Chug, Lanka Mahesh, Sagrika Shukla, Pulkit Chandra

Keywords : All-on-4®, Immediate loading, Implant, Micromotion, Rehabilitation

Citation Information : Chug A, Mahesh L, Shukla S, Chandra P. Deciphering All-on-4® and Its Perspectives. Int J Oral Implantol Clin Res 2017; 8 (2-3):35-39.

DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10012-1165

License: CC BY-NC 4.0

Published Online: 01-12-2017

Copyright Statement:  Copyright © 2017; Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) Ltd.


Abstract

All-on-4® treatment concept has been widely accepted by implantologist and has become a common procedure in many dental practices. But is it a favorable technique and how long will the implants last when the entire frame work of 12 teeth is embedded in maxillary soft bone and immediately loaded? It is difficult and baseless to argue and conclude the benefits of All-on-4® as the literature lacks required data; nonetheless, this article has tried to provide readers an unbiased opinion, as the final choice of the treatment lies in the clinician\'s discretion keeping patient needs in consideration.


PDF Share
  1. Malo P, Rangert B, Nobre M. “All-on-Four” immediate-function concept with Branemark system implants for completely edentulous mandibles: a retrospective clinical study. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2003;5(Suppl 1):2-9.
  2. Albrektsson T, Zarb G, Worthington P, Eriksson AR. The longterm efficacy of currently used dental implants: a review and proposed criteria of success. JOMI 1986 Jan;1(1):11-25.
  3. Chug A, Shukla S, Mahesh L, Jadwani S. Osseointegration— molecular events at the bone–implant interface: a review. J Oral Maxfac Surg Med Path 2013 Jan;25(1):1-4.
  4. Albrektsson T, Brånemark PI, Hansson HA, Lindström J. Osseointegrated titanium implants: requirements for ensuring a long-lasting, direct bone-to-implant anchorage in man. Acta Orthop Scand 1981;52(2):155-170.
  5. Brånemark R, Brånemark PI, Rydevik B, Myers RR. Osseointegration in skeletal reconstruction and rehabilitation: a review. J Rehabil Res Dev 2001 Mar-Apr;38(2):175-181.
  6. Brånemark PI. Osseointegration and its experimental studies. J Prosthet Dent 1983 Sep;50(3):399-410.
  7. Davies JE. Understanding peri-implant endosseous healing. J Dent Edu 2003 Aug;67(8):931-949.
  8. Depprich R, Zipprich H, Ommerborn M, Mahn E, Lammers L, Handschel J, et al. Osseointegration of zirconia implants: an SEM observation of the bone-implant interface. Head & Face Medicine. 2008 Dec;4(1):25.
  9. Colnot C, Romero DM, Huang S, Rahman J, Currey JA, Nanci A, et al. Molecular analysis of healing at a bone–implant interface. J Dent Res 2007 Sep;86(9):862-867.
  10. Schatzker JG, Horne JG, Sumner-Smith G. The effect of movement on the holding power of screws in bone. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1975 Sep;111:257-262.
  11. Uhthoff HK. Mechanical factors influencing the holding power of screws in compact bone. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1973 Aug;55(3):633-641.
  12. Armitage J, Natiella J, Greene G Jr, Meenaghan M. An evaluation of early bone changes after the insertion of metal endosseous implants into the jaws of rhesus monkeys. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1971 Oct;32(4):558-568.
  13. Driskell, TD. Comment in discussion. Proc. Symposium on dental biomaterials and research priorities. DHEW publication 1973.74:226.
  14. Nixon J. Clinical observations of cortical and medullary bone regeneration surrounding the Linkow blade-vent implant. Oral Implantol 1975 Winter;5(3):378-401.
  15. Perren SM. Evolution of the internal fixation of long bone fractures. The scientific basis of biological internal fixation: choosing a new balance between stability and biology. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2002 Nov;84(8):1093-1110.
  16. Trisi P, Perfetti G, Baldoni E, Berardi D, Colagiovanni M, Scogna G. Implant micromotion is related to peak insertion torque and bone density. Clin Oral Implants Res 2009 May;20(5):467-471.
  17. Szmukler-Moncler S, Piattelli A, Favero GA, Dubruille JH. Considerations preliminary to the application of early and immediate loading protocols in dental implantology. Clin Oral Implants Res 2000 Feb;11(1):12-25.
  18. Malo P, Rangert B, Nobre M. All-on-4 immediate-function concept with Branemark system implants for completely edentulous maxilla: a 1 year retrospective clinical study. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2005;7(Suppl 1):S88-S94.
  19. Block MS, Widner JS. Method for insuring parallelism of implants placed simultaneously with maxillary sinus bone grafts. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1991 Apr;49(4):435-437.
  20. Fortin Y, Sullivan RM, Rangert BR. The Marius implant bridge: surgical and prosthetic rehabilitation for the completely edentulous upper jaw with moderate to severe resorption: a 5-year retrospective clinical study. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2002 Jul;4(2):69-77.
  21. Babbush CA, Kanawati A, Kotsakis GA, Hinrichs JE. Patientrelated and Financial outcomes analysis of conventional full-arch rehabilitation versus the All-on-4 Concept: a cohort study. Implant Dent 2014 Apr;23(2):218-224.
  22. Krekmanov L, Kahn M, Rangert B, Lindström H. Tilting of posterior mandibular and maxillary implants for improved prosthesis support. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2000 May- Jun;15(3):405-414.
  23. Chan MH, Holmes C. Contemporary “All-on-4” concept. Dent Clin N Am 2015 Apr;59(2):421-470.
  24. Heydecke G, Zwahlen M, Nicol A, Nisand D, Payer M, Renouard F, et al. What is the optimal number of implants for fixed reconstructions: a systematic review. Clin Oral Implants Res 2012 Oct;23(Suppl 6): 217-228.
  25. Malo P, Nobre MA, Lopes A. The rehabilitation of completely edentulous maxillae with different degrees of resorption with four or more immediately loaded implants: a 5-year retrospective study and a new classification. Eur J Oral Implantol 2011;4(3):227-243
  26. Branemark PI, Svensson B, van Steenberghe D. Ten-year survival rates of fixed prostheses on four or six implants ad modum branemark in full edentulism. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 1995 Dec;6(4):227-231.
  27. Taruna M, Chittaranjan B, Sudheer N, Tella S, Abusaad M. Prosthodontic perspective to All-on-4® concept for dental implants. J Clin Diagn Res 2014 Oct;8(10):ZE16-ZE19.
  28. Mattsson T, Kondell PA, Gynther GW, Fredholm U, Bolin A. Implant treatment without bone grafting in severely resorbed edentulous maxillae. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1999 Mar;57(3):281-287.
  29. Bellini CM, Romeo D, Galbusera F, Agliardi E, Pietrabissa R, Zampelis A, et al. A finite element analysis of tilted versus nontilted implant configurations in the edentulous maxilla. Int J Prosthodont 2009 Mar-Apr;22(2):155-157.
  30. Rangert B, Jemt T, Jörneus L. Forces and moments on Brånemark implants. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1989;4(3):241-247
  31. Baggi L, Pastore S, Di Girolamo M, Vairo G. Implant-bone load transfer mechanisms in complete-arch prostheses supported by four implants: a three dimensional finite element approach. J Prosthet Dent 2013 Jan;109(1):9-21.
  32. Kim KS, Kum YL, Bae JM, Cho HW. Biomechanical comparison of axial and tilted implants for mandibular full arch fixed prosthesis. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2011 Sep- Oct;26(5):976-984.
  33. Zampelis A, Rangert B, Heijl L. Tilting of splinted implants for improved prosthodontic support: a two-dimensional finite element analysis. J Prosthet Dent 2007 Jun;97(6 Suppl): S35-S43.
  34. Dallenback K, Hurley E, Brunski JB, Rangert B. Biomechanics of in-line vs offset implants supporting a partial prosthesis. J Dent Res 1996;75:1327.
  35. Bevilacqua M, Tealdo T, Pera F, Menini M, Mossolov A, Drago C, et al. Three dimensional finite element analysis of load transmission using different implant inclinations and cantilever lengths. Int J Prosthodont 2008 Nov-Dec;21(6): 539-542.
  36. White SN, Caputo AA, Anderkvist T. Effect of cantilever length on stress transfer by implant—supported prosthesis. J Prosthet Dent 1994 May;71(5):493-499.
  37. Caputo AA. Standlee. Biomechanics in clinical dentistry. Chicago. Quintessence. 1987:19-23.
  38. Duyck J, Van Oosterwyck H, Vander Sloten J, De Cooman M, Puers R, Naert I. Magnitude and distribution of occlusal forces on oral implants supporting fixed prosthesis—an in vivo study. Clin Oral Implants Res 2000 Oct;11(5):465-475.
  39. Silva GC, Mendonça JA, Lopes LR, Landre J Jr. Stress patterns on implants in prostheses supported by four or six implants: a three dimensional finite element analysis. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2010 Mar-Apr;25(2):239-246.
  40. Begg T, Geerts GA, Gryzagoridis J. Stress patterns around distal angled implants in the all-on-4® concept configuration. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2009 Jul-Aug;24(4):663-671.
  41. Frost HM. Perspectives: bone's mechanical usage windows. Bone Miner 1992 Dec;9(3):257-271.
  42. Isidor F. Influence of forces on peri-implant bone. Clin Oral Implants Res 2006 Oct;17(Suppl 2):8-18.
  43. van Eijden TM. Three-dimensional analyses of human biteforce magnitude and moment. Arch Oral Biol 1991;36(7): 535-539.
  44. Graf, H. Occlusal forces during function. In: Rowlands CC, editor. Occlusion: research on form and function. Ann Arbor (MI): University of Michigan Press; 1975. p. 90-110.
  45. Engelke W, Decco OA, Rau MJ, Massoni MC, Schwarzwaller W. In vitro evaluation of horizontal implant micromovement in bone specimen with contact endoscopy. Implant Dent 2004 Mar;13(1):88-94.
  46. Misch CE, Degidi M. Five-year prospective study of immediate/ early loading of fixed prostheses in completely edentulous jaws with a bone quality-based implant system. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2003;5(1):17-28.
PDF Share

© Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) LTD.