International Journal of Oral Implantology & Clinical Research

Register      Login

VOLUME 2 , ISSUE 1 ( January-April, 2011 ) > List of Articles

ORIGINAL IN VITRO STUDY

Luting Agent Effectiveness on Implant Crown Retention

Göknil Ergün Kunt, Gözlem Ceylan, Nergiz Yilmaz, Bahar Esin Küçük

Citation Information : Kunt GE, Ceylan G, Yilmaz N, Küçük BE. Luting Agent Effectiveness on Implant Crown Retention. Int J Oral Implantol Clin Res 2011; 2 (1):7-11.

DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10012-1029

License: CC BY-ND 4.0

Published Online: 00-04-2011

Copyright Statement:  Copyright © 2011; Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) Ltd.


Abstract

Statement of problem: Due to the conflicting results in literature, it is not clear which luting agent is suitable for implant retained fixed restorations in different clinical situations. Purpose: The purpose of this study was to compare the retention of single crowns on implant direct abutments cemented with different conventional luting agents. Materials and methods: The study included 98 single crowns cemented with seven luting agents on to the abutments. Sandblasting was used as surface treatment. After cementation thermocycling was applied. The uniaxial tensile force was applied to all test crowns using universal test machine (Instron) at 0.5 mm/min. The load required to dislodge each crown was recorded in Newton. Means and standart deviations of loads at failure were analyzed using ANOVA. Statistical significance was set at (p < 0.05). Results: There were statistically significant differences among the groups for each luting agents (p < 0.05). Using adhesive resins (Panavia F 2.0) showed higher bond strength values in both sandblasted and nonblasted groups. The weakest bond strength values were obtained by using temporary luting agent (Cavex temporary cement). Conclusions: Within limitations of this study it can be said that when strong retention is necessary for implant-retained prosthesis, adhesive resin system is more retentive than zinc phosphate and zinc polycarboxylate. If the restoration needs retriavibilty, noneugenol temporary luting agent can be offered. Clinical Implications: Retentiveness of implant-retained fixed restorations is related not only to surface characteristics of abutment and crown but also to luting agents.


PDF Share
  1. Sadig WM, Al Harbi MW. Effects of surface conditioning on the retentiveness of titanium crowns over short implant abutments. Implant Dent 2007;16:387-96.
  2. Gilboe DB, Teteruck WR. Fundamentals of extracoronal tooth preparation. Part I. Retention and resistance form. J Prosthet Dent 1974;32:651-56.
  3. Perel ML. Progressive prosthetic transference for root form implants. Implant Dent 1994;3:42-45.
  4. Kim Y, Yamashita J, Shotwell JL, Chong KH, Wang HL. The comparison of provisional luting agents and abutment surface roughness on the retention of provisional implant supported crowns. J Prosthet Dent 2006;95:450-55.
  5. Jorgensen KD. The relationship between retention and convergence angle in cemented veneer crowns. Acta Odont Scand 1955;13:35-40.
  6. Hebel KS, Gajjar RC. Cement-retained versus screw-retained implant restorations: Achieving optimal occlusion and esthetics in implant dentistry. J Prosthet Dent 1997;77:28-35.
  7. Kent DK, Koka S, Froeschle ML. Retention of cemented implant-supported restorations. J Prosthet Dent 1997;6:193-96.
  8. Covey DA, Kent DK, St Germain HA JR, Koka S. Effects of abutment size and luting cement type on the uniaxial retention force of implant-supported crowns. J Prosthet Dent 2000;83: 344-48.
  9. Proussaefs P. Crowns cemented on crown preparations lacking geometric resistance form. Part II: Effect of cement. J Prosthet Dent 2004;13:36-41.
  10. Wiskott HWA, Nicholls JI, Besler UC. The relationship between abutment taper and resistance of cemented crowns to dynamic loading. Int J Prosthodont 1996;9:117-30.
  11. Wiskott HWA, Besler UC, Scherrer SS. The effect of film thickness and surface texture on the resistance of cemented extracoronal restorations to lateral fatigue loading. Int J Prosthodont 1999;12:255-62.
  12. Parker MH, Malone KH, Trier AC, Striano TS. Evaluation of resistance form for prepared teeth. J Prosthet Dent 1991;66: 730-33.
  13. Trier AC, Parker MH, Cameron SM, Brousseau JS. Evaluation of resistance form of dislodged crowns and retainers. J Prosthet Dent 1998;80:405-09.
  14. Dixon DL, Breeding LC, Lilly KR. Use of luting agents with an implant system: Part II. J Prosthet Dent 1992;68:885-90.
  15. Breeding LC, Dixon DL, Bogacki MT, Tietge JD. Use of luting agents with an implant system: Part I. J Prosthet Dent 1992;68:737-41.
  16. Misch CE. Principles of cement-retained fixed implant prosthodontics. Dental Implant Prosthetics. St Louis: Elsevier- Mosby 2005;414-51.
  17. Di Francescantonio M, de Oliveira MT, Garcia RN, Romanini JC, da Silva NR, Giannini M. Bond Strength of Resin Cements to Co-Cr and Ni-Cr Metal Alloys Using Adhesive Primers. J Prosthodont 2009;19:125-29.
  18. Smith DC. A new dental cement. Br Dent J 1968;125:381-84.
  19. Saito C, Sakai Y, Node H, Fusayama T. Adhesion of polycarboxylate cements to dental casting alloys. J Prosthet Dent 1976;35:543-48.
  20. Ady AB, Fairhurst CW. Bond strength of two types of cement to gold casting alloy. J Prosthet Dent 1973;29:217-19.
  21. Moser JB, Brown DB, Greener EH. Short-term bond strengths between adhesive cements and dental alloys. J Dent Res 1974;53:1377-86.
  22. DJ GaRey, AH Tjan, RA James, AA Caputo. Effects of thermocycling, load-cycling, and blood contamination on cemented implant abutments. J Prosthet Dent 1994;71:124-32.
  23. GH Clayton, CF Driscoll, SO Hondrum. The effect of luting agents on the retention of marginal adaptation of the CeraOne implant system. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1997;12: 660-65.
  24. Tarica DY, Alvarado VM, Truong ST. Survey of United States dental schools on cementation protocols for implant crown restorations. J Prosthet Dent 2010;103:68-79.
  25. LC Breeding, DL Dixon, MT Bogacki, JD Tietge. Use of luting agents with an implant system: Part I, J Prosthet Dent 1992;68:737-41.
  26. G Bernal, M Okamura, CA Muñoz. The effects of abutment taper, length and cement type on resistance to dislodgement of cement-retained, implant-supported restorations. J Prosthodont 2003;12:111-15.
  27. RL Schneider. Evaluation of the retention of castings to endosseous dental implants. J Prosthet Dent 1987;58:73-78.
  28. YH Pan, LC Ramp, CK Lin, PR Liu. Comparison of 7 luting protocols and their effect on the retention and marginal leakage of a cement-retained dental implant restoration. Int J Maxillofac Implants 2006;21:587-92.
  29. K Akça, H Iplikçioglu, MC Cehreli. Comparison of uniaxial resistance forces of cements used with implant-supported crowns. Int J Maxillofac Implants 2002;17:536-42.
  30. Mansour A, Ercoli C, Graser G, Tallents R, Moss M. Comparative evaluation of casting retention using the ITI solid abutment with six cements. Clin Oral Implants Res 2002;13: 343-48.
  31. Sheets JL, Wilcox C, Wilwerding T. Cement selection for cement-retained crown technique with dental implants. J Prosthodont 2008;17:92-96.
  32. Squier RS, Agar JR, Duncan JP, Taylor TD. Retentiveness of dental cements used with metallic implant components. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2001;16:793-98.
  33. Bernal G, Okamura M, Muñoz CA. The effects of abutment taper, length and cement type on resistance to dislodgement of cement-retained, implant-supported restorations. J Prosthodont 2003;12:111-15.
  34. International Organization for Standardization. ISO TR 11405. Dental materials-guidance on testing of adhesion to tooth structure. Geneva, Switzerland: International Organization for Standardization 1994;1-15.
  35. Webber RL, Horton RA, Tyndall DA, et al. Tuned aperture computed tomography (TACT): Theory and application for 3D dentoalveolar imaging. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 1997;26: 53-62.
  36. Webber RL, Horton RA, Underhill TE, et al: Comparison of film, direct digital, and tuned-aperture computed tomography images to identify the location of crestal defects around endosseous titanium implants. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 1996;81:480-90.
  37. Kobayashi K, Shimoda S, Nakagawa Y, Yamamoto A. Accuracy in measurement of distance using limited cone-beam computerized tomography. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2004;19:228-31.
  38. Mozzo P, Procacci C, Tacconi A, Martini PT, Andreis IA. A new volumetric CT machine for dental imaging based on conebeam technique: Preliminary results. Eur Radiol 1998;8: 1558-64.
  39. Maria Eugenia Guerrero, Reinhilde Jacobs, Miet Loubele, Filip Schutyser, Paul Suetens, Daniel van Steenberghe. State of the art on cone-beam CT imaging for preoperative planning of implant placement. Clin Oral Invest 2006;10:1-7.
  40. Abrahams JJ, Frisoli JD, Dembner J. Anatomy of the jaw, dentition, and related regions. Semin Ultrasound CT MR 1995;16:453-67.
  41. Jolesz F, Nabavi A, Kikinis R. Integration of interventional MRI with computer assisted surgery. Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging 2001;13:69-77.
  42. Lauterbur PC. Image formation by induced local interactions: examples employing nuclear magnetic resonance. Nature 1973;242:190-91.
  43. Parkkola RK, Mattila KT, Ekfors TO, Komu MES, Vaara T, Aro HT, MR-guided core biopsies or soft tissue tumors on an open 0.23 T Imager. Acta Radiologica 2001;42:302-05.
  44. Stark DD, Bradley WG (Eds). Magnetic Resonance imaging. St. Louis: CV Mosby, 1999.
  45. Gray CF, Redpath TW, Smith FW, Staff RT. Advanced imaging: Magnetic resonance imaging in implant dentistry. Clin Oral Impl Res 2003;14:18-27.
  46. Gray CF, Redpath TW, Smith FW. Presurgical dental implant assessment by magnetic resonance imaging. Journal of Oral Implantology 1996;22:147-53.
  47. Guler AU, Sumer M, Sumer P, Bicer I: The evaluation of vertical heights of maxillary and mandibular bones and the location of anatomic landmarks in panoramic radiographs of edentulous patients for implant dentistry. J Oral Rehabil 2005;32:741-46.
  48. Bennett DA. Computed tomography: Reducing the Cost and Increasing The Effectiveness of Dental Implantology. Dent Implantol Update 2005;16:57-63.
  49. Xie Q, Bedran-Russo AK, Wu CD. In vitro remineralization effects of grape seed extract on artificial root caries. J Dent 2008 Nov;36(11):900-906.
  50. Vinitha M, Balal M. In vitro anticandidal activity of cinnamomum vernum. J Med Sci 2008;8(4):425-428.
  51. Aneja KR, Joshi R. “Antimicrobial activity of Amomum subulatum and Elettaria cardamomum against dental caries causing microorganisms. Ethnobotan Leaflets 2009 Jul;13: 840-849.
  52. Arweiler NB, Donos N, Netuschil L, Reich E, Sculean A. Clinical and antibacterial effect of tea tree oil—a pilot study. Clin Oral Investig 2000 Jun;4(2):70-73.
  53. Soukoulis S, Hirsch R. The effects of a tea tree oil-containing gel on plaque and chronic gingivitis. Aust Dent J 2004 Jun;49(2):78-83.
  54. Michie CA, Cooper E. Frankincense and myrrh as remedies in children. J R Soc Med 1991 Oct;84(10):602-605.
  55. Greene DA. Gold, frankincense, myrrh, and medicine. N C Med J 1993 Dec;54(12):620-622.
  56. Bonifait L, Grenier D. Cranberry polyphenols: potential benefits for dental caries and periodontal disease. J Can Dent Assoc 2010;76:a130.
  57. Bodet C, Grenier D, Chandad F, Ofek I, Steinberg D, Weiss EI. Potential oral health benefits of cranberry. Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr 2008 Aug;48(7):672-680.
  58. Weiss EI, Kozlovsky A, Steinberg D, Lev-Dor R, Bar Ness Greenstein R, Feldman M, Sharon N, Ofek I. A high molecular mass cranberry constituent reduces mutans streptococci level in saliva and inhibits in vitro adhesion to hydroxyapatite. FEMS Microbiol Lett 2004 Mar;232(1):89-92.
  59. Abdul Sattar BA, Hassan AM, Hassan AS. In vitro antimicrobial activity of thymus vulgaris, origanum vulgare and rosmarinus officinalis against dental caries pathogens. Ibn Al-Haitham J Pure Appl Sci 2012 Jan;25(2):1-7.
  60. Huang MT, Ho CT, Wang ZY, Ferraro T, Lou YR, Stauber K, Ma W, Georgiadis C, Laskin JD, Conney AH. Inhibition of skin tumorigenesis by rosemary and its constituents carnosol and ursolic acid. Cancer Res. 1994 Feb;54(3):701-708.
  61. Bernardes WA, Lucarini R, Tozatti MG, Souza MG, Silva ML, Filho AA, Martins CH, Crotti AE, Pauletti PM, Groppo M, et al. Antimicrobial activity of tosmarinus officinalis against oral pathogens: relevance of carnosic acid and carnosol. Chem Biodivers 2010 Jul;7(7):1835-1840.
  62. Parolia A, Thomas MS, Kundabala M, Mohan M. Propolis and its potential uses in oral health. Int J Med Sci 2010 Jul;2(7): 210-215.
  63. Oncag O, Cogulu D, Uzel A, Sorkun K. Efficacy of propolis as an intracanal medicament against Enerococcus faecalis. Gen Dent 2006 Sep-Oct:54(5):319-322.
  64. Martin MP, Pileggi R. A quantitative analysis of propolis: a promising new storage media following avulsion. Dent Traumatol 2004 Apr:20(2):85-89.
  65. Carbajal D, Casaco A, Arruzazabala L, Gonzalez R, Tolon Z. Pharmacological study of Cymbopogon citratus leaves. J Ethnopharmacol 1989 Feb;25(1):103-107.
  66. Sanches NR, Cortez DAG, Schiavini MS, Nakamura CV, Filho BPD. An evaluation of antibacterial activities of Psidium guajava. Braz Arch Biol Technol 2005 May;48(3):4229-4230.
  67. Sanda KA, Grema HA, Geidam YA, Bukar-Kolo YM. Pharmacological aspects of Psidium guajava: an update. Int J Pharmacol 2011 May;7:316-324.
  68. Menezes SM, Cordeiro LN, Viana GS. Punica grantum (pomegranate) extract is active against dental plaque. J Herb Pharmacother 2006;6(2):79-92.
  69. Vasconcelos LC, Sampaio FC, Sampaio MC, Pereira Mdo S, Higino JS, Peixoto MH. Minimum inhibitory concentration of adherence of punica granatum linn (pomegranate) gel against S. mutans, S. mitis and C albicans. Braz Dent J 2006;17(3): 223-227.
  70. Prasad D, Kunnaiah R. Punica granatum: a review on its potential role in treating periodontal disease. J Indian Soc Periodontol 2014 Jul;18(4):428-432.
  71. Sauvaire Y, Petit P, Baissac Y, Ribes G. Chemistry and pharmacology of fenugreek. In: Herbs, botanicals and teas. Mazza G, Oomah BD, editors. Lancaster, Pennsylvania: Technomic Pub. Co; 2000. p. 107-129.
  72. Acharya SN, Basu SK, Thomas JE. Methods for the improvement of plant medicinal properties with particular reference to fenugreek (Trigonella foenum-graecum L.). In: Acharya SN, Thomas JE, editors. Advances in medicinal plant research. Kerala, India: Research Signpost; 2007b p. 491-412.
  73. Al-Habori M, Raman A. Pharmacological properties in fenugreek. - In: Petropoulos GA, editor. The genus trigonella. 1st ed. London and New York: Taylor and Francis 2002. p. 163-182.
  74. Saini P, Al-Shibani N, Sun J, Zhang W, Song F, Gregson KS, Windsor LJ. Effects of calendula officinalis on human gingival fibroblasts. Homeopathy 2012 Apr;101(2):92-98.
  75. Khairnar MS, Pawar B, Marawar PPA. Evaluation of calendula officinalis as an anti-plaque and anti-gingivitis agent. J Indian Soc Periodontol 2013 Nov-Dec;17(6):741-747.
  76. Chakraborthy GS. Antimicrobial activity of leaf extract of calendula officinalis Linn. J Herb Med Toxicol 2008 Jun;2(2):65–66.
  77. Zilda CG, Claudia MR, Sandra RF. Antifungal activity of the essential oil from calendula officinalis L growing in Brazil. Braz J Microbiol 2008;39(1):61-63.
  78. Bussadori SK, Castro LC, Galvão AC. Papain gel: a new chemo-mechanical caries removal agent. J Clin Pediatr Dent 2005 Winter;30(2):115-119.
  79. Bertassoni LE, Marshall GW. Papain-gel degrades intact nonmineralized type I collagen fibrils. Scanning 2009 Nov- Dec;31(6):253-258.
  80. Moon SE, Kim HY, Cha JD. Synergistic effect between clove oil and its major compounds and antibiotics against oral bacteria. Arch Oral Biol 2011 Sep;56(9):907-916.
  81. Pinto E, Vale-Silva L, Cavaleiro C, Salgueiro L. Antifungal activity of the clove essential oil from Syzygium aromaticumon, candida, aspergillus and dermatophyte species. J Med Microbiol 2009 Nov;58(Pt 11):1454-1462.
  82. Olajide OA, Makinde JM, Awe SO. Evaluation of the pharmacological properties of nutmeg oil in rats and mice. Pharma Biol 2000;38(5):385-390.
  83. Thanoon SZ, Al-Refai AS, Kamal A. Antibacterial effect and healing potential of nutmeg oil for chemically induced oral ulcerations in rabbits. Zanco J Med Sci 2013;17(2): 393-399.
  84. Mitwally MF, Casper RF. Use of an aromatase inhibitor for induction of ovulation in patients with an inadequate response to clomiphene citrate. Fertil Steril 2001;75:305-09.
  85. Sammour A, Bijan MM, Tan SL, Tulandi T. Prospective randomised trial comparing the effects of letrazole (LE) and clomiphene citrate (CC) on follicular development, endometrial thickness and pregnancy rate in patients undergoing superovulation prior to intrauterine insemination (IUI). Fertil Steril 2001;76(Suppl 1):S110.
  86. Mitwally MF, Casper RF. Single-dose administration of an aromatase inhibitor for ovarian stimulation. Fertil Steril 2005;83:229-31.
  87. Fisher SA, Reid RL, Van Vugt DA, Casper RF. A randomized double-blind comparison of the effects of clomiphene citrate and the aromatase inhibitor letrozole on ovulatory function in normal women. Fertil Steril 2002;78:280-85.
  88. Fatemi HM, Kalibianakis E, Tournaye H, Camus M, Van Steirteghem AC, Devroey P. Clomiphene citrate vs letrozole for ovarian stimulation: A pilot study. Reprod Biomed Online 2003;7:543-46.
  89. Hu Y, Cortvrindt R, Smitz J. Effects of aromatase inhibition on in vitro follicle and oocyte development analyzed by early preantral mouse follicle culture. Mol Reprod Dev 2002;61: 549-59.
  90. Shetty G, Krishnamurthy H, Krishnamurthy HN, Bhatnagar S, Moudgal NR. Effect of estrogen deprivation on the reproductive physiology of male and female primates. J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol 1997;61:157-66.
  91. Mitwally MF, Casper RF. Aromatase inhibition reduces gonadotrophin dose required for controlled ovarian stimulation in women with unexplained infertility. Hum Reprod 2003;18:1588-97.
  92. Mitwally MF, Casper RF. Aromatase inhibition improves ovarian response to follicle-stimulating hormone in poor responders. Fertil Steril 2002;77:776-80.
  93. Goswami SK, Das T, Chattopadhyay R, Sawhney V, Kumar J, Chaudhury K, Chakravarty BN, Kabir SN. A randomized single blind controlled trial of letrozole as a low-cost IVF protocol in women with poor ovarian response: A preliminary report. Hum Reprod 2004;19:2031-35.
  94. Newkirk KM, Chandler HL, Parent AE, et al. Ultraviolet radiation-induced corneal degeneration in 129 mice. Toxicol Pathol 2007;35:819-26.
  95. Pettenati MJ, Sweatt AJ, Lantz P, et al. The human cornea has a high incidence of acquired chromosome abnormalities. Hum Genet 1997;101:26-29.
  96. Snibson GR. Collagen cross-linking: A new treatment paradigm in corneal disease—a review. Clin Experiment Ophthalmol 2010;38:141-53.
  97. Spoerl E, Raiskup-Wolf F, Kuhlisch E, Pillunat LE. Cigarette smoking is negatively associated with keratoconus. J Refract Surg 2008;24:S737-40.
  98. Rabinowitz YS, Nesburn AB, McDonnell PJ. Videokeratography of the fellow eye in unilateral keratoconus. Ophthalmology 1993;100:181-86.
  99. Goodrich DW, Lee WH. The molecular genetics of retinoblastoma. Cancer Surv 1990;9:529-54.
  100. Moodaley LC, Woodward EG, Liu CS, Buckley RJ. Life expectancy in keratoconus. Br J Ophthalmol 1992;76:590-91.
  101. Honein MA, Dawson AL, Petersen EE, Jones AM, Lee EH, Yazdy MM, Ahmad N, Macdonald J, Evert N, Bingham A, et al. Birth defects among fetuses and infants of US women with evidence of possible Zika virus infection during pregnancy. JAMA 2017 Jan 3;317(1):59-68.
  102. Chervenak FA, Jeanty P, Cantraine F, Chitkara U, Venus I, Berkowitz RL, Hobbins JC. The diagnosis of fetal microcephaly. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1984 Jul 1;149(5):512-517.
  103. Papageorghiou AT, Thilaganathan B, Bilardo CM, Ngu A, Malinger G, Herrera M, Salomon LJ, Riley LE, Copel JA. ISUOG Interim Guidance on ultrasound for Zika virus infection in pregnancy: information for healthcare professionals. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2016 Apr;47(4):530-532.
  104. Chibueze EC, Parsons AJ, Lopes KD, Yo T, Swa T, Nagata C, Horita N, Morisaki N, Balogun OO, Dagvadorj A, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of ultrasound scanning for prenatal microcephaly in the context of Zika virus infection: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Sci Rep 2017 May 23;7(1):2310.
  105. Cordeiro MT. Zika virus: laboratory diagnosis. In: Zika in focus. Springer International Publishing; 2017. pp. 59-62.
  106. Mlakar J, Korva M, Tul N, Popović M, Poljšak-Prijatelj M, Mraz J, Kolenc M, Resman Rus K, Vesnaver Vipotnik T, Fabjan Vodušek V, et al. Zika virus associated with microcephaly. N Engl J Med 2016 Mar 10;374(10):951-958.
  107. Zare Mehrjardi M, Keshavarz E, Poretti A, Hazin AN. Neuroimaging findings of Zika virus infection: a review article. Jpn J Radiol 2016 Dec;34(12):765-770.
  108. Oliveira Melo AS, Malinger G, Ximenes R, Szejnfeld PO, Alves Sampaio S, Bispo de Filippis AM. Zika virus intrauterine infection causes fetal brain abnormality and microcephaly: tip of the iceberg? Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2016 Jan;47(1):6-7.
  109. Araujo AQ, Silva MT, Araujo AP. Zika virus-associated neurological disorders: a review. Brain 2016;139(8):2122-2130.
  110. Brasil P, Pereira JP Jr, Moreira ME, Ribeiro Nogueira RM, Damasceno L, Wakimoto M, Rabello RS, Valderramos SG, Halai UA, Salles TS, et al. Zika virus infection in pregnant women in Rio de Janeiro. N Engl J Med 2016 Dec 15;375(24):2321-2334.
PDF Share

© Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) LTD.